Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R.A., Hofstein, A., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok, R., Niaz, M., Treagust, D. &Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education 88(3): 397–419.
Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1995). Reflections on a fifth-grade life science lesson: Making sense of children’s understanding of scientific models. International Journal of Science Education,17, 59–74.
Ajzen, I. 2002. Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1–20.
Appleton, K. and Asoko, H. (1996), A case study of a teacher’s progress toward using a constructivist view of learning to inform teaching in elementary science. Science Education, 80,165–180.
Astor-Jack, T., McCallie, E. & Balcerzak, P. (2007). Academic and Informal Science Education Practitioner Views About Professional Development in Science Education. Science Education, 91(4), 604-628.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In Peterson, P. L., Baker, E., Mc Gaw, B. (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548–556). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Boudreaux, A., Shaffer, P., Heron, P., & McDermott, L. (2008). Student understanding of control of variables: Deciding whether or not a variable influences the behavior of a system, American Journal of Physics, 76 (2), 163-170. doi:10.1119/1.2805235
Bryan, A.L. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40,835–868.
Bybee, R. (2006) Scientific inquiry and science teaching: In L., Flick & N., Lederman, Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1-14.
Carlsen, W. S. (1991), Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75, 631–647. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750605
Chin, C.C. (2004). Museum experience –A resource for science teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1,) 63-90.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 14, 133–148. doi:10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0.
Cohen, D.K. & Hill, H.C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294–343.
Davidson, S. K., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning in zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers and zoo educators. Science Education, 94, 122–141.
Dean, Jr., D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. ScienceEducation, 91(3), 384-397. doi:10.1002/sce.20194
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
Duschl, R., & R. Grandy (Eds.). (2008) Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Fang, Ζ, (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices, Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65, DOI: 10.1080/0013188960380104
Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining the beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 981– 1003.
Flick, L.B. (2006) Developing Understanding of Scientific Inquiry in Secondary Students. In L. Flick & N. Lederman, Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 157-72.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Gelman, R., Brenneman, K., Macdonald, G. & Moisés, R. (2010). Preschool pathways to Science. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
Gillies, R. M., & Nichol, K. (2015). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171–191.
Goelz, L. (2004). Teacher beliefs and practice: Consistency or inconsistency in the high school social studies classroom? In L.P. McCoy (Ed.), Studies in teaching 2004: Research digest. Research Projects Presented at Annual Research Forum, Wake Forest University Department of Education Winston-Salem, NC, December. Retrieved from http://users.wfu.edu/goellj4/Research%20Draft%20Final.pdf
Haney, J.J., Lumpe, A.T., & Czerniak, C.M. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 171– 187.
Janssen, F.J.J.M., Westbroek, H., & Van Driel, J.H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers? Instructional Science, 42(1), 67-90.
Kahle, J. B., Meece, J. and Scantlebury, K. (2000), Urban African-American middle school science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching, 37,1019–1041.
Kallery, M. (2016). Early-Years Teachers’ Professional Upgrading in Science: A long term programme, Research in Science Education. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9575-1
Kang, N.H. (2008). Learning to teach science: Personal epistemologies, teaching goals, and practices of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 478–498.
Kariotoglou, P., Avgitidou, S., Dimitriadou, C., Malandrakis, G., Papadopoulou, P., Pnevmatikos, D., & A. Spyrtou (2016) A Science Teacher’s Professional Development Project Focusing Teaching Design. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto& K. Hahl (Eds.), Electronic Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 14 Strand 14 In-service science teacher education, continued professional development, Co-editors: Amanda Berry & Digna Couso, (pp. 2360-2369). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6.
Kariotoglou, P., Spirtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Zoupidis A. (2012). Current trends in Science Curricula: The cases of inquiry and the visits in TechnoScience sites in the European Project: MaterialsScience. Themes of Science and Technology in Education, 5 (1-2), 153-164. http://earthlab.uoi.gr/thete/index.php/thete/article/view/140 (in Greek).
Karnezou, M., Avgitidou, S.,& Kariotoglou P.(2013) Links Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Their Practices in a Science and Technology Museum Visit, International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 3(3), 246-266.
Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L., & Yeary, S. (2004). Theory Building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: a case study of third and fourth grade students’ developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299-1324. doi:10.1080/0950069042000177226
Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019–1041.
Kisiel, J. (2013). Introducing Future Teachers to Science Beyond the Classroom. Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 24(1), 67-91.
Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1021-1043.
Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230-1275.
Mc Robbie, C. and Tobin, K. (1995), Restraints to reform: The congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom. Jοurnal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 373– 385. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320406
National Research Council. (2000). Educating teachers of science, mathematics and technology: New practices for a new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. Philip Bell, Bruce Lewenstein, Andrew W. Shouse, and Michael A. Feder, Editors. Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS], The Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 2013).
Perkins, D.N., & Grotzer, T.A. (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: the role of complex causal models in students’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 41, 117-166. doi:10.1080/03057260508560216
Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720-744.
Scott, C.L. (2015). THE FUTURES of LEARNING 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. [ERF Working Papers Series, No. 14].
Smith, D. & Neale, D. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1–19.
Spyrtou, A., Zoupidis, A., and Kariotoglou, P. (2011). Primary students’ difficulties in nderstanding Control of Variables Strategy in floating-sinking, Synopsis / Extended abstract in International Conference of European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), 5-9 September 2011, Lyon, France.
Tobin, K., Tippins. D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science, in D. L. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, New York, Macmillan, 45-93.
Tsaliki C., Malandrakis G., Zoupidis A., Karnezou M., & P. Kariotoglou (2016). Science teachers’ profile changes concerning non-formal education design. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto & K. Hahl (Eds.), Electronic Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 14 Strand 14 In-service science teacher education, continued professional development, Co- editors: Amanda Berry & Digna Couso, (pp. 2370-2377). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6.
Vosniadou, S. (2010). Instructional considerations in the use of external representations. In Verschaffel et al. (eds), Use of representations in reasoning and problem solving, (pp. 36-54). New York: Routledge.
Wiser, M., & Smith, C. (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in grades K-8: When should the atomic-molecular theory be introduced? In S. Vosniadou (ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, (pp. 205-239). New York: Routledge.
Zoupidis, A., Pnevmatikos D., Spyrtou, A., and Kariotoglou, P. (2016a). The impact of the acquisition of Control of Variables Strategy and nature of models in floating-sinking phenomena reasoning and understanding of density as property of materials, Instructional Science, 44, 315-334. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9375-z.
Zoupidis, A., Spyrtou, A., Malandrakis, G., Kariotoglou, P. (2016b). The evolutionary refinement process of a Teaching Learning Sequence for introducing inquiry aspects and density as materials’ property in floating / sinking phenomena, In D. Psillos& P. Kariotoglou (Eds.), Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences, (pp. 167-199), Springer.
Zoupidis, A., Strangas, A., Kariotoglou, P. (2017). Contributions of explicit instruction in understanding the control of variables strategy: the case of preschool student teachers. In B.C. Dimov (Ed.), Education Across Borders: «Education and research across time and space» (pp.412 – 418). Bitola, FYROM: ISBN ISBN 978-9989-100-51-2.
